Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Monday, November 9
    Top Stories:
    • China AI Milestone: Models Generate More Tokens Than They Trained On
    • Why Some People Hear Pitch Better: The Role of Internal Noise
    • China’s Robotaxis: What It’s Really Like to Ride
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    IO Tribune
    • Home
    • AI
    • Tech
      • Gadgets
      • Fashion Tech
    • Crypto
    • Smart Cities
      • IOT
    • Science
      • Space
      • Quantum
    • OPED
    IO Tribune
    Home » Monty Hall Variants Stump Small LLMs Like Qwen2.5
    AI

    Monty Hall Variants Stump Small LLMs Like Qwen2.5

    Staff ReporterBy Staff ReporterNovember 9, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Summary Points

    1. Classic Monty Hall: Switch—your odds rise from 1/3 to 2/3 because the host knows where the car is and deliberately reveals a goat.
    2. Change the host’s rule, change the answer: If the host opens a random door or offers a swap only under certain conditions, switching may be no better—or may always lose.
    3. The tested AI models mostly kept saying “switch.” They often ignored the host’s rules, even when their own explanations correctly repeated them.
    4. Takeaway: A famous puzzle’s familiar answer isn’t proof of reasoning. Change one key rule and check whether the answer changes too.

    A familiar answer can mislead

    In the classic Monty Hall problem, switching gives you a two-thirds chance of winning. But that answer depends on the host’s rules. If the host opens a random door without knowing where the car is, switching offers no advantage. If the host offers a swap only when you picked the car, switching always loses.

    The doors stay the same. The evidence changes.

    Small models kept choosing “switch”

    A test put four Qwen2.5 models, from 0.5 billion to 7 billion parameters, and Phi-3.5-mini through six versions of the puzzle. The models often chose “switch,” even when the host’s behavior made that choice wrong. On four such versions, their average confidence in the correct answer ranged from 0% to 13%. Random guessing would score 33%.

    Their written explanations showed the same pattern. Some models repeated the host’s rule, then reasoned as if the classic rules still applied. So a familiar answer could survive even after the problem changed.

    Test the rule, not just the answer

    The study is small. It covers a handful of compact models and puzzle variants, not every AI system. A correct answer to one famous puzzle also cannot prove that a model lacks reasoning. Still, the results offer a useful warning: fluent explanations and high confidence do not guarantee that a model noticed a changed assumption.

    For developers and users, the practical lesson is simple. Change one rule and check whether the answer changes too. That kind of test can reveal whether a model follows the problem or reaches for a memorized response.

    Expand Your Tech Knowledge

    Dive deeper into the world of Cryptocurrency and its impact on global finance.

    Discover archived knowledge and digital history on the Internet Archive.

    AITechV1

    AI Artificial Intelligence LLM VT1
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleNASA Backs Student Moon Base Challenge With $1 Million
    Avatar photo
    Staff Reporter
    • Website

    John Marcelli is a staff writer for IO Tribune, with a passion for exploring and writing about the ever-evolving world of technology. From emerging trends to in-depth reviews of the latest gadgets, John stays at the forefront of innovation, delivering engaging content that informs and inspires readers. When he's not writing, he enjoys experimenting with new tech tools and diving into the digital landscape.

    Related Posts

    Space

    NASA Backs Student Moon Base Challenge With $1 Million

    November 9, 2026
    Gadgets

    How to Restore the All Apps Button in Samsung One UI

    November 9, 2026
    AI

    OpenAI Agents SDK: Multi-Agent Systems Explained

    November 8, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Must Read

    Monty Hall Variants Stump Small LLMs Like Qwen2.5

    November 9, 2026

    NASA Backs Student Moon Base Challenge With $1 Million

    November 9, 2026

    How to Restore the All Apps Button in Samsung One UI

    November 9, 2026

    OpenAI Agents SDK: Multi-Agent Systems Explained

    November 8, 2026

    China AI Milestone: Models Generate More Tokens Than They Trained On

    November 8, 2026
    Categories
    • AI
    • Crypto
    • Fashion Tech
    • Gadgets
    • IOT
    • OPED
    • Quantum
    • Science
    • Smart Cities
    • Space
    • Tech
    Most Popular

    ByteDance’s AI Research Leader Departs Amid Monetization Push

    June 6, 2026

    Disrupt 2025: Charles Hudson and Navin Chaddha Take the Builders Stage!

    July 22, 2025

    Supercharge Your Language Models: Unleashing New Powers at MIT!

    December 17, 2025
    Our Picks

    DEXs Reach $419B in Volume Amid Market Corrections: CoinGecko

    November 30, 2025

    Why AI Won’t Wipe Out Humanity with Bioweapons

    September 18, 2026

    Melatonin Unveils New Power: Repairing DNA Damage Naturally

    May 30, 2026
    Categories
    • AI
    • Crypto
    • Fashion Tech
    • Gadgets
    • IOT
    • OPED
    • Quantum
    • Science
    • Smart Cities
    • Space
    • Tech
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2025 Iotribune.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.